webpaint.ing: free drawing and painting in your browser

webpaint.ing (also written webpainting) is a paint, comic and animation studio that opens in a browser. Draw with pressure-sensitive brushes, pencils and watercolor, make pixel art, use layers, selections and gradients, animate frame by frame with onion skin, export your work as pictures or MP4 video, and draw together with other people in a shared drawing. It saves on your device and keeps working offline. It needs a browser with WebGPU, and you sign in with a webpost.ing account.

webpost.ing is the blogging site it works with: drawings can be posted there.

What the tools do

About webpaint.ing and webpost.ing

Webpainting and webposting are designed by Mae Pigeon (me). I leave software implementation to a rational AI text model. I have architected the application features and provided the model with core technologies and feedback to build what I want out of the application.

While I disclose that the code for the application is mostly written by AI, I do not train on or collect user drawings for any form of AI training. Nor do I include AI-generated artwork within the application.

I aim to have the brushes and tools grounded in math, physics, and computer graphics technology, with some defaults programmed by AI. It will eventually contain functionality that allows users to create custom scripts in the application using GDScript and WebGPU compute shaders to achieve highly custom brushes and effects in the app, using a plugin platform identical to the one the AI uses to create the defaults.

I see web app development, to an extent, as a means to an end to build a useful system, and don't see AI assistance for coding as necessarily bad. I understand that there is a lot of disdain towards generative AI in the world of arts, and would love to hear thoughts on the matter. I think the issues generally concern using generative AI to create artwork, which I think is kinda bad. One of the great things about artworks is that they are based on the human lived experience, and reflect a person's unique perspectives and creative ideas. I don't like generative image generation or creative writing; there is something uncanny about it, and how corporations tend to approach it resembles stealing from artists. Artists spend so much time developing their art style and direction, and generative AI "art" definitely feels wrong to me.

I guess reasoning and coding skills in LLMs come from AI stealing code, but to an extent I feel okay with having agents write code for me; it helps me develop and iterate on my ideas faster. The technology is unlikely to go away, so I guess I see it as a higher-level abstraction that can convey my ideas into code for me using machine reason and engineering skill.

I'd love to hear opinionated thoughts on these matters, so please do reach out to me through my contact form or socials on maepigeon.com.